https://www.sijl.ir/ Quran, Islamic Jurisprudence and Law en daily 1 Thu, 23 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0330 Thu, 23 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0330 https://www.sijl.ir/article_224285.html In verse 104 of Surah Al-Imran, Almighty God has given attention to "calling to good" along with the two duties of "commanding good" and "forbidding evil". In our jurisprudence and exegesis, "inviting to good" is sometimes equal to "enjoining good and forbidding evil" and sometimes it is a combination of both and sometimes it is a third concept that is different from those two duties. Contrasting the call to goodness is particularly important since it can lead to the birth of separate jurisprudential tasks and the creation of independent laws and institutions in the field of thought and implementation. This research has tried to solve this problem by collecting library and analytical research method in the framework of jurisprudence,to prove the hypothesis of comparing the institution of calling to good from other two duties, or at least the general and specific relationship, and taking into consideration the related jurisprudential works. https://www.sijl.ir/article_224284.html The Holy Quran is a book of divine guidance that needs to be questioned in order to clarify its divine intentions and the meaning of its verses. The most important issue regarding thematic interpretation is the authority and validity of the results of this interpretive style. This research with ijtihad method along with descriptive, analytical and critical data processing seeks to examine the arguments of the authority of thematic interpretation in terms of the necessity and possible narrative and intellectual barriers to the validity of this interpretive method. The most important results and innovations of this research are as follows:1- Proving the public-private relationship between the interpretation of the Qur'an to the Qur'an and the thematic interpretation. 2- Sufficiency of the arguments for the authority of the interpretation of the Qur'an to the Qur'an to prove the authority of the thematic interpretation at the point of commonality. 3- The completeness of the argument to some verses and narrations and the rational tradition signed and consensus to prove the authenticity of this type of interpretation. 4- Non-obstruction of the narrations of multiplication and rational arguments presented from the authority of thematic interpretation. https://www.sijl.ir/article_232904.html The preservation of human dignity and personal honor is among the fundamental principles of Islamic law, manifested through various legal injunctions. This study investigates the ruling on qadhf (false accusation of adultery) as one of the key protective mechanisms in safeguarding individuals’ reputation, with particular focus on Qurʾān 24:4. Adopting a descriptive-analytical approach and drawing on jurisprudential and exegetical sources, the research explores the phrase “wa alladhīna yarmūna al-muḥṣanāt” (“those who accuse chaste women”). The findings indicate that the rulings related to qadhf, beyond their penal aspect, serve as a preventive measure in maintaining the moral and social order of society. By offering a fresh interpretation of the term muḥṣanāt and reconsidering the scope of qadhf, the study creates space for re-evaluating traditional approaches. Furthermore, the issue of rejecting the testimony of the accuser (qādhif) and the conditions for its reinstatement are examined as significant implications of this ruling. The relevance of this research is heightened in the modern context, given the expansion of social interactions and digital media, which facilitate the spread of accusations. The study’s findings contribute to clarifying the role of Islamic legal injunctions in preserving human dignity and strengthening the ethical foundations of society. https://www.sijl.ir/article_224291.html The family is considered one of the most important basic elements of the society, whose health, strength and stability play a significant role in the health of the members of the society; Accordingly, based on the dignity of the revelation of the verses related to the rule of harm, a series of criteria are extracted from the verses of the Qur'an, which are the basis of action in the field of the family; So that some of these criteria lead to basic challenges in the family field and it is necessary to take an effective step towards the stability and sustainability of the family by identifying and providing solutions to solve these challenges. In this research, which was carried out using a descriptive and analytical method, the results were obtained that based on the dignity of the revelation of the verses, whether in the stage of family formation, or in the stage of its life and dissolution, the occurrence of some behaviors by family members is an example of harm other family members, identifying these losses and extracting strong and logical rules from the verses and traditions of the rule of harm, can be effective in the field of legislation of new rules. https://www.sijl.ir/article_232905.html A key question concerning muḥārabah (armed hostility) is whether it should be classified, in legal terminology, as a “habitual crime” (jarīmah bi-l-ʿāda) requiring repeated acts, or as a “simple crime” (jarīmah basīṭa) realized through a single occurrence. In other words, does the establishment of the crime of muḥārabah necessitate the repeated act of brandishing a weapon (at least twice)? This study seeks to address this question by employing a library-based methodology and an analytical–ijtihādī approach within the framework of Islamic jurisprudence, with particular reference to the muḥārabah verse (Q 5:33). The findings demonstrate that no valid textual or jurisprudential basis exists for requiring repetition of weapon-brandishing in order to establish muḥārabah. Neither the term yuḥāribūn (a present-tense verb) nor the phrase yasʿawna fī al-arḍ fasādan (a present-tense verb with the root saʿy) in the noble verse indicate such a condition. Moreover, the absolute wording of Qurʾānic and hadith evidence, as well as the formulations of jurists in defining muḥārabah, affirm that repetition is not a prerequisite. In cases of doubt, however, primary principles—such as istishāb (presumption of continuity), the principle of darʾ (averting punishments in cases of doubt), and precaution regarding life and blood—support rejecting the necessity of repeated weapon-brandishing for muḥārabah https://www.sijl.ir/article_224293.html "Sedition" and rebellion against the ruling Islamic government is one of the issues that have been the subject of numerous rulings in Imami jurisprudence. Some Imami jurists have considered the verse Sharifa Baghi as including the term "baghi" and based on this verse, they have proved or denied the rules and conditions for the crime of "baghi". On the other hand, some others consider this verse to be unrelated to the uprising against the government and consider its contents specific to tribal conflicts in the Islamic society. According to the latter point of view, proving conditions such as having a group in the fulfillment of Baghi by referring to the verse of Baghi or negating some conditions based on the application of this verse is fundamentally incorrect.The following article has evaluated the verse in question with an analytical and critical method and examined its relation to some jurisprudential terms from the two angles of customary manifestation and narrative interpretation. The findings of this research indicate that the common appearance of the words used in the verse of Sharifah has nothing to do with the uprising against the Islamic government, and the various expressions presented to show inclusion in relation to the rebellion are not acceptable. Narratives that may be cited to prove the connection between Aya Sharifah and the term Baghi are also not capable of reasoning due to the weakness of the document or the implication. https://www.sijl.ir/article_179645.html AbstractEnjoining the good and forbidding the evil is the most important command of God in the field of public responsibility among Muslims, and since the beginning of Islam, these two basic duties have played a significant role in the dynamism and movement of the Islamic society towards ideals.One of the requirements of research in the field of enjoining the good and forbidding the evil is to study these two duties with other topics such as calling for good, supervision, criticizing, renouncing the ignorant, and so on. Regarding the first three titles, considerable research has been done, but less attention has been paid to the relationship between turning away from the ignorant and enjoining the good and forbidding the evil.This article focuses on verse 199 of Surah A'raf, and based on the views of commentators and jurists, the descriptive-analytical method of examining the inclusion or non-inclusion of the concept of enjoining the good and forbidding the evil in relation to the Qur'anic interpretation of "avoiding the ignorant" And considering the existence of two different approaches, the findings of the article indicate two different results:If in the taste of the Shari'ah, the criterion in enjoining the good and forbidding the evil is addressed in the form of prohibition, the renunciation of the ignorant will not be as enjoining the good and forbidding the evil; But if we consider the legislation of these two duties as a criterion, considering that the criterion of the Shari'ah is the requirement of enjoining the good and forbidding the evil to create the good and the non-fulfillment of the bad, this criterion is also present in the ignorant and this category is a subset of two duties.