"Sedition" and rebellion against the ruling Islamic government is one of the issues that have been the subject of numerous rulings in Imami jurisprudence. Some Imami jurists have considered the verse Sharifa Baghi as including the term "baghi" and based on this verse, they have proved or denied the rules and conditions for the crime of "baghi". On the other hand, some others consider this verse to be unrelated to the uprising against the government and consider its contents specific to tribal conflicts in the Islamic society. According to the latter point of view, proving conditions such as having a group in the fulfillment of Baghi by referring to the verse of Baghi or negating some conditions based on the application of this verse is fundamentally incorrect.The following article has evaluated the verse in question with an analytical and critical method and examined its relation to some jurisprudential terms from the two angles of customary manifestation and narrative interpretation. The findings of this research indicate that the common appearance of the words used in the verse of Sharifah has nothing to do with the uprising against the Islamic government, and the various expressions presented to show inclusion in relation to the rebellion are not acceptable. Narratives that may be cited to prove the connection between Aya Sharifah and the term Baghi are also not capable of reasoning due to the weakness of the document or the implication.